Adults - Back Row: Elizabeth Caroline Blocker Myers, wife of Joseph William Myers, Joseph William Myers and Francis Joel Myers, Joseph William Myers' father. The two children could be Julia and Marquis (Mark) Myers based on the approximate time period for this photo, and their estimated age in the photo based on their appearance.
People in photo include: Joseph William Myers, Emma Kelley Myers, Sarah Anna Myers, Robert Davis Myers, Francis Joel Myers, Elizabeth Caroline Blocker Myers, and Elizabeth Caroline Blocker Myers
It took hours for one good photo. This was a best. Most the time they had to stare into the sun. Glum. I'd say forget it. Thank God for modern technology
I am a third generation photographer with 3 masters degrees in photography and thw reason for no smiles in the early times in photos is that the exposures were mostly 10 minutes long, so hard to hold a smile that long and still be in focus. Alsi the chin issue of the mom is damage on the photo, not disfuguration.
I think you're right about the chin issue being damage, but when the photo is enlarged, it actually does look like the left side of her mouth is a bit swollen and looks like her cheek is bruised (and possibly above her eye as well).
I was thinking the same thing, that the husband may have hit her. It really does look like she is bruised on the left side of her face and under her eye and above her eye.
Thank you it drives me insane when people say "oh they look so unhappy" or "life was so hard then they had nothing to smile about" and life was hard but that's all they knew so I'm sure when they did have happy times I'm sure they were very happy. Also you never hear old stories of your ancestors that they had such a sad horrible life so why would people think others had it worse then their own families. Unless you come from a rich line of people I assume most peoples lives then were fairly similar.
I posted my reply above, but women and children were the property of men...like cows. I don't think being a woman (especially a poor woman) would be a good thing to be back in those days. The religious South is not exactly easy on women to this day...you think women were treated with dignity back then in places like Mississippi?? Doubt it!
It really is more like damage on the photograph or bad digital retouching, it looks swollen because it is lighter in that area, so a scuff or someone trying to retouch and went too light. Her neck is lighter than her cheek, so that makes it look like there is a bump on the cheek. There are more reasons, but I am low on time right now.
Thanks for the nice explanation Sandy Sahagian. I LOVE photography and I'm a pretty good amateur but wish I had taken it further. I studied music instead. I just love pictures and have taken thousands in my day. It's really great to hear an expert opinion, though.
I don't think people should be forced to smile for every photo anyway. It's unnatural unless you're feeling it. And, I don't think it was a 'requirement' in early photography to smile.
Sandy Sahagian you beat me to the comment I was going to make! My grandparents were born in the late 1800s and my maternal grandmother always sat stone faced when a camera came out. She also would ask "Is it done?" We have no photos of her beautiful smile because she was taught to be still & expressionless for pictures.
I wonder how many pictures would an average family sitting would get? Like now we get picture packages and send some to family. So I wonder if they could only afford 1 picture, like getting a portrait painted? Or did they get at least 2 to give away at least 1 to someone else?
When photography came into being in the late eighties, it was very, very costly. The family would dress in Their Sunday best for the photo shoot. These poor souls are dressed in tatters and probably had to mortgage their home to pay the photographer, no wonder they are so solemn. Tough times.
I dare to disagree, that chin and mouth look swollen, and the whole side of her face looks red (darker) than the rest. Nobody else in the picture has that distortion.
If they were truly mortgaging their home to pay for that photographer they would have made the best of the moment and looked better! It WAS the time exposure that caused the solemn expression, and photographers in those days charged a reasonable amount considering the time, materials and expertise it took just like today.
...or you know how it is when the fam is all trying to get dressed up and ready to have pics taken, kids aren't cooperatin', mom and pop get upset, puts everyone in a bad mood ... I've been there!
I can't help but notice the holes in their clothes and no shoes on the children. You know they wore their best clothes for such an occasion and it really brings home how hard the times were for them. They were true hero's back then just for being able to live and provide for their families. Many people of today wouldn't last a month if we were picked up and sat down in their time and shoes. Me included I'm sure. We owe a lot to these people who carved out our country and I'm honored to look at their pictures from so long ago.
It is possible that this was damage to the photo, but yes, the dirt farmers of the south were still feeling the effects of the Civil War in the 1890's.
Photographers used to go door to door offering to take photos for a small fee. Often the family didn't have time to prepare their sunday best and were tired. This poor woman looks like she had to take care of every one....
you said it so much better than I ever could, Ericka. All the modern appliances we have today ( dishwasher, washer and dryer) and we still complain how we have no time. How many of us could manage like they did? God bless them!
It would have been such a chore to do anything back then that sometimes when I get frustrated with my hectic life I actually think of these tired souls and what hard really was. They lived it. But what always grabs me by the heart when I think about life back then is all the deaths they had to face. People got sick...and they died. It was a part of life and a lot of that death was children. As a mother myself its hard to imagine everything they must have endured every time a baby sneezed or a loved one coughed. Fear that it could turn deadly and no medicine to give them! How scary and sad to have to think about much less face everyday. I respect these people so much.
Not an easy life they had but now it makes more sense why so many old photos have ppl not smiling, as the photographers have explained. I still would prefer these photos over some of the narcissistic selfies that some ppl take.
Thank you Sandy, I have none of your qualifications, and even I KNEW that! I see so many people posting things about them not smiling. Try to hold a smile that long-even 1 minute! I am an amateur genealogist, VERY amateur, even after 12 years, and I have been able to find professional photos of many of my husband's family dating back to mid 1800's. Not even 1 was smiling-except for one family shot and the baby didn't know any better and had a little smile-can't imagine how she held it for that long!LOL I think it's hard even to have a relaxed face for too long.
The camera that was used was most likely an 8x10 view camera which requires a long exposure time. If they smiled the chances are the photographs would appear blurred because of any movement. It too hard to maintain a steady smile. Life was hard, still is, but now we smile. I love studying these pictures.
This is what a relative wrote on an old family photo that I posted. Someone made a comment about how serious everyone looked and he explained ... " Camera's took long exposures so folks had to remain very still. A smile would have turned to a grimace by the time the photographer was finished. That's why pictures of horses often have blurred heads because they moved when everyone around them remained still / rigid." ... enjoying your site.
When I blew up the photo it looked like the lady's husband had used her for a punching bag recently. In addition to her chin looking swollen it looks like she has bruises as well. That might have something to do with her unhappy look.
maybe the wife was helping with chores....maybe behind the plow horses, & they were 'spooked'...pulling & dragging the 'misses' across a hard, bumpy ground, face first.... js'ing that you never know, she may have made the hubby a nice punching bag too!!
It does look like a memento mori photograph. Usually the dark colouring in the hands is an indication that the person is dead. Not saying this is one, but it could be mistaken for one.
Families had a hard time... Today some groups say that all white people were rich and exploitative, and must compensate the other for having privileges in the past.
Sheri Herrick, my first husband is a Herrick from Ohio, so my two sons are Herrick's, I am also into geneology but I haven't gotten back to Scotland yet. I got my ex's maternal Sullivan back to Scotland.
yes, it took a long time to take the photos. So they didn't smile and went with a relaxed facial expression so they wouldn't suddenly move during the process. Atleast that is what my grandma told me.
I still say the kids look scared. And the mama looks angry. Probably all the work in the house was being delayed, they did have to do so much in those days.
The older man has a bit of a twinkle in his eye I always wonder how they could stop kids from smiling probably the amount of time they had to sit still did that
Don't think those were holes in their clothes but defects on the pictures because if you notice the "specks" are also on their hands and all over the picture.
More like complete mystification. People had no experience having their photo taken. They had no idea what the photographer was doing and the box he was working with could make your picture. Most had never seen a painting, let alone a photograph.
I am guessing the little girl started wiggling and the daddy smacked her or yelled at her. He looks mad and the girl looks scared and the mother looks helpless and grandpa is grinning.
Okay, we know that in those days people didn't smile because of the time exposure of the shot, but There Is something More in this portrait . The woman has Her hair so Tightly pulled back it indicates a Very Stressful life and I am Not just talking about hard work ! She looks like someone has just given her a Flat Swollen Lip. Her shoulders are slightly Hunched, her hands are Obedient, her head is Stooped as if Fearful, she is some what Cringing and her Eyes reek of Abuse. The woman's whole Demeanor indicates that she is Controlled and has No Rights. What is the age difference between the woman and the said husband, twenty years perhaps ? I am reading him as 48-50 years of age. She would have been a Very, Very young bride ... if she is the mother ?
Sydney 2014
SANDY SAHAGIAN, I have been looking a picture of great grandfather that was in the civil war,as i was reading you were 3 generation. daniel wallace was his name, 1821-1903. A BRICK WALL FOR ME. thanks for your time
No because of the amount of time the actual photos took to expose to the large plate sometimes people had to sit for extensive amounts of time. Most people in photos or paintings never smile because they were pissed off from having it take so long. Especially if they had to count every minute as money lost.
Generally a calm, solemn expression makes for a dignified work, as has constantly been portrayed throughout art history....even centuries before the first photograph was taken.
My great Uncle John was a photographer in those days. He lived to be100 yrs. old. Many of his glass plate negetives, camers, etc. were all very well presurved and in pristine condition. One thing I remember seeing was several metal rod like pieces with cross piece near the top, or curved metal brackett at top. Reminded me of a porcelain doll stand. These were placed down the back, under jacket or shawl or whatever, and craddled head to keep person being photogrphed from moving head side to side, or moving period. I am sure that added to the already unpleasant situation.
First clue...Mississippi....and women and children were still considered property. Women were owned by men like cows until 1894 (didn't change right away). They were considered the same as slaves. It lasted in Kentucky until 1890. Life was not easy in many ways back then either and many children did not live to adulthood and women often didn't survive child birth.
Why is it that every old pic you see from that period looks like they are about to kill you. I have the Time Life series of the old west & all of the pics resemble those faces. Must not have been a very pleasant time.
Love these old time sepia tone pics I have one of my granfather when he was a boy with his sister, one of his brothers, his dad and mom, my granddfather has his dog in the pic with him and his sister has her cat. I just treasure that pic.
Is this a postmortem photo? The mother looks off, she face drooping maybe she is passed and held up by a device behind her. that would explain a lot I think...
You are a bunch of jump to conclusions idiots. My family has been in Mississippi for 150 years. None of the women have ever been beat, belonged to the KKK or any thing like that. Talk about bigots. Have you ever heard of poor? Have you ever heard of abscessed tooth? If you don't know the story behind a photo you should keep your comments to yourself.
The gentleman on the right is Francis Joel Myers, my 4x Great Grandfather. He immigrated to America from Germany as a young man in the early 1800's, married and had children here. The other man in the photo is his son, the brother to my 3x Great Grandfather.
What we know about the Myers is that they were poor and worked very hard as farmers and ranchers, surviving off the produce of their land.
Times were hard back then, both Francis Joel and his sons survived and fought in the Civil War, and of course, life in the south after the war was harsh. It took years for families to rebuild and begin to prosper again.
The grandson of Francis Joel Myers, Walter Daniel Myers, my Great-Great Grandfather, owned a small country grocery store in Mississippi and was also the local postmaster. While I did not know the people in the picture personally, I did know people who did, or who heard first hand about them. I know for a fact that my paternal grandfather, born and raised in Mississippi, was taught from birth to be a southern gentleman, and he in turn taught that to me.
To this day, I open doors for my wife, and pull her chair out for her at restaurants to help her be seated. We were all taught southern gentleman ways and I have never apologized for being that way. Never did I hear of my grandfather, or his father abusing their wife.
To the people who posted disrespectful comments, think how you would feel if others posted similar comments about your ancestors and their families. It is just plain disrespectful.
Well wishes to all, be well, be happy, and be good to others, especially those you love, for life is very sweet, but also very very short. There is no time for being unkind.
Portrait photographs and paintings of our loved ones and ancestors.
Before photos we had paintings of family members - most usually these were reserved for the well off. The era of modern photography began with the daguerreotype, in 1839. Since the advent of photogr...
Gary Eugene Gray was born in northwest Louisiana to parents Ronald Eugene Gray and Melba Dean Tubbs Gray in northwest Louisiana. He has a keen interest in genealogy for the sake of preserving his family history not only for the present day family members, but future generations as well.
You can find him on WikiTree, a free and open community of genealogy enthusiasts and also for all to enjoy free of charge.
Gary is a graduate of the McCombs School of Business at The University of Texas at Austin and he is also a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas.
Gary is married to Paula and they have one son, Connor. Together, they have a happy life.
Gary's interests are his family and volunteering at his son's sporting events, science, history, politics, economics, business, sailing, flying, baroque classical music as well as ancient music, writing, genealogy, roller coasters, jet ski's, and just about anything that is fast and thrilling. During the early 1980's, Gary enjoyed skydiving, having made 217 jumps, with most of those being long duration free-fall. I found that I am related to several famous people including famous singers, business people as well as state and national politicians. Additionally, I am related to famous people of the past including famous scientists and a famous fighter at the battle of the Alamo. The link to famous people runs through my paternal as well as maternal lines. Very exciting.