Albert and Mabel Pazcoch
Added
Updated Aug 05, 2015
Taken:
in San Francisco, California United States
People in This Photo
ADVERTISEMENT
BY ANCESTRY.COM
Find records of Albert Paczoch
Find records of Albert
Comment on Albert and Mabel Pazcoch
Julie Vallance I am 39 and I was raised that way. When I was married we had agreed that was a good solution and I rather enjoy staying home with my babies.
They were dancing in this picture, or at least posed as if they were!
Don't think so, if you look carefully his ears and jaw line is different.
The back right? No, I have this photo and its completely gone below the elbow.
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
They are wearing mutton sleeve dresses. I think her arm is behind her. There's a hint of fleshy if you hold the photo back a little.
Back row
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
I did not notice, wait, I have other photos of a woman with a missing right arm.
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
I treasure all my collection, but posted several here.
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
The woman is I feel having another look. So your probably right.
I would love it if it was the same couple. What a coincidence if it is. They seem just a little older.
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
Its a bit hard to tell cause I have to roll up and down to compare. Maybe your right but they sure are a picture of happiness.
It looks like them but a little older? And a different angle?
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
Really trying to figure out if this is the same couple because the one I posted is part of my personal collection. As soon as I saw this it looked familiar.
Is this the same couple???
That is wrong ----bill they are examples of what married life should be like .seeing them happy make people long for what they had .even after 100 years it is good to see .
As it must to all of us, just a family photo and, when the family is gone and the photo is meaningless and somebody comes up with a name it is, no longer, a "life". . . . .just an " Ancient Photo." And, so it is, with all of us.
This is the reason I'm compelled to collect them, and display them. They are not forgotten.
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
Before or after the earthquake?
It is the touching rule in action. In public married couples should stand at least 15 inches apart. At home there are no boundaries!
Thank goodness for the "no boundaries" rule or we would not be here enjoying these photos! ha ha.
I wonder if their descendents still live here.
No, they do not. They had 2 daughters. One died at age 1 month. They were separated in 1915 and divorced in 1917. He never remarried. She remarried and spent the rest of her life in the East Bay. Her daughter (my mother) spent most of her life in the East Bay also.
They are smiling. First time I have seen that. Usually they both look like someone has a shot gun in the wings
My grandparents wedding (circa 1920's)
Because of respectability, just because they were married people back then did not show public displays of affection, it was considered crass.
Julie Vallance i am 42 and agree with you 100 %
Aug 09, 2015
on
·
·
Its Mrs vallance. At 73 I think you are rude. I've already stated that economics paves the way for women to work and that I did not suffer from that condition. I only found out the other day that someone on a site had been called a troll. I had it explained to me. No, I'm not a troll, yes I have very old fashioned ideals and as far as living with or being brought up by them, no, both my parents just taught me to respect peoples differences not attack. Obviously your parents failed teaching you simple manners and I have aslresady stated I will say and do as I please. I do not apologise for my views. So maybe it is you who are the troll. Why on earth do you care how I live?
Oh my God! Ms Vallance, I am almost 73 and I think you are weird. You must have been raissed by the Amish or something like them. Most mothers would like to stay home in their kids younger years, but with the economics today impossible for most. Come back into modern days. Oh I hadn't thought, you may also be a Troll.
I'm 62 years old. No-one pushes me around or tells me what I can and cannot do. Mothers who have babies should stay at home and be mothers, not have strangers look after their kids. Women should have their husbands dinner ready and piping hot when he walks in the door after work. House-work is women's work. Hard toil is a mans job. If a man wants to assist a woman fine. If he wants to sit while she looks after him that's fine too. My husband works 12 hour days. Why on earth would I who are home all day expect him to do mine as well. We do not fight , ever, whatever I want I get, he treats me like gold and I treat him the same. I can go and do what ever I wish but honestly I'd rather spend my life doing what makes us both happy. Of course he is well paid. I don't need to work and if I did he would hate it. Everyday I get told darling I'm home. How many get that response that's really meant from the heart. Say what you wish and apologise to no-one. Each to their own.
They felt I was a non supporter of women's progressive movements...ugh
People were angry? Tell them to get a life. You like whatever you want to.
I had once said on another site, how I loved this particular period. Recieved alot of angry comments, how can you not like this seemingly simpler time?
found her, she died in 1978 and they had 1 child Hazel Ruth
I think it is a sweet photo. I wonder why they are so far apart :-)
Wow a Victorian period picture taken with smiles and motion. Very rare and wonderful.
San Francisco, CA in 1908.
